Picture
The Music Machine
I recently read this fantastic post from The New Yorker - "The Song Machine: The Hitmakers Behind Rihanna".

It was an excellent read, albeit lengthy, so I want to share some of the main points I took away from it:

  • Perhaps showing some ignorance for the hit machine approach to pop music, I had never heard of Tor Hermansen and Mikkel Eriksen, the team of Norwegian writer-producers known as Stargate. These guys have written the music behind some of the biggest tracks in recent pop / RnB including "Rude Boy" ("Come on, rude boy, boy, can you get it up / Come on, rude boy, boy, is you big enough?") and “S&M” (“Na-na-na-na-na come on”) from Rihanna, "Irreplaceable" from Beyoncé, and Katy Perry’s "Firework".
  • Stargate are one of a relatively small number of highly successful hit maker producers, who write the backing tracks to many of today's Top 40 songs. However the vocal lines are generally composed by an almost exclusively female group of "top-liners". 
  • The top-liners listen to the music created by the producer and within a short amount of time come up with the main melody, lyrics and the general "catchiness" of the songs we end up hearing. The outcome of this is a demo track which is then shopped out to keen stars such as Beyoncé, Rihanna, Katy Perry, Lady Gaga.
  • Importantly this helps explain why so much Top 40 and commercial radio music is so same-y, familiar, and to many (including me) - mundane. The music is not drawn from a planet full of inspiration but from a very small pool of highly efficient producers and top liners, a small pool of professionals who survive by churning hits out quickly.
  • Because of this, sometimes the musical output on the charts can be too similar. In 2009, both Beyoncé and Kelly Clarkson had hits (Beyoncé’s "Halo" and Clarkson’s "Already Gone"). Both were created from the same track from producer Ryan Tedder. Clarkson wrote her own top line, and Beyoncé co-created hers with Evan Bogart. Tedder didn't mention to either artist that the other was working with his track, so both went to market and both were hits. Crazy.
  • Successful top-liners include Makeba Riddick, Bonnie McKee, and Skylar Grey - none of whom are household names like the performers who make their work famous. However it is pointed out that creating the hit melody does not mean the top-liner wants (or deserves) the fame of the stars we know - after all, the Rihannas of the world are the ones everyone looks at when they walk into the room, dealing with manic publicity and touring, and needing to produce live what people come to expect from a highly polished studio album.

I enjoyed reading at the end of the article the reality check felt by these hit-making producers, especially in the wake of the monstrous success of Adele and her huge single "Someone Like You". The emotional lyrics and raw acoustic accompaniment in this track are nothing like the digital, arpeggiator-created, effect-laden music typical of the charts and these producers.

With an arsenal of studio equipment and production hours, it is still not possible to formulate a timeless "classic" that will really connect with people.

When the power to the machines is switched off, all the samples and pre-programmed loops are lost and all you have is your talent, what do you bring to the table?

 


Comments

DR Entertainment/ DR MUSIC
09/04/2012 5:06am

I have my 40 years of hard work and successes.

Reply
09/04/2012 10:10am

Which is longer than myself and many producers would have been alive!

Reply
Chris Breeze
12/04/2012 11:04pm

It's pop music. People have been complaining about it, what it is, how it's made and who makes it for decades. Its raison d'être is to appeal to as many people as possible. You find it same-y and mundane - of course you do! The audience they're aiming for is the one that knows shit about music. The one that has hit on 'Halo' on Youtube 125 million times.

Reply
12/04/2012 11:34pm

Chris - that's true, and I'm certainly not the lone ranger with these comments.

What a sad reality though, that keeping things familiar and template-driven for the masses dominates over emotional connection, creativity and performance talent.

This seems to happen to the point that many people experience little beyond pop music, unaware of the universe of what music is and can be.

And that is a shame.

Reply
Chris Breeze
12/04/2012 11:57pm

I disagree. I think if it wasn't for pop music a lot of people would listen to NO music, which would be a bigger shame. Plus don't underestimate how tricky it is to write pop music well - look at Dr.Luke (Kesha, Katy Perry etc.) - great musician, great writer, great producer. Don't make the mistake of thinking that because you're not into it, it's no good.

Reply
13/04/2012 8:02am

Commercial pop music, the subject of this post, has been around for (depending on exactly how you want to define it), 100 years or so. Music and communication through music is ancient, being around virtually as long as human existence. I can't agree that people would listen to no music if pop music did not exist as it does.

Also, I'm not underestimating that there is talent involved in producing or performing pop music. Of course there is. Composition and performance of any kind requires skill. Nor did I say it was easy to do.

I stand by my comments however that the pop charts are dominated by same-y and mundane music. Perhaps I incorrectly inferred you agreed with your earlier comment that pop music is aimed at an audience "that knows shit about music".

Finally - I also didn't say pop music is no good. There's a hell of a lot of variety and music in the world which I don't listen to but nor do I say it's no good. There is an audience for everything and the fact that my diet does not include large servings of commercial pop does not mean I claim that it is no good or has no value.

Reply
Chris Breeze
13/04/2012 8:10pm

Your essential point is that there's a qualitative difference between music made with 'samples and pre-programmed loops' and someone who sings a song with live accompaniment a la Adele. There isn't. You can do either well or badly - its the judgement of the performer/producer that counts and I say that as a long time professional pianist. The reason pop music tends to be 'same-y' is because certain things work and there's nothing wrong with that. Its like saying all cake is roughly the same. Anyway you've decided how it is in your own mind and nothing I'm gonna say will change that, so, cheers -

Reply
13/04/2012 8:47pm

Thanks for clarifying your interpretation of what my "essential point" is.

I have clearly stated that there IS talent in composing pop music, performing pop music, and have agreed that it can be both good and valuable.

The small pool of origin of many pop tracks is just one factor in the reason commercial top 40 pop music sounds so similar, others I have discussed in other posts, including that people tend to listen to commercial radio because it’s easy, non-challenging and familiar. The moment the playlist strays into unfamiliar territory and away from the established normality, you risk losing listeners. By its very nature commercial radio exists to generate income. Less listeners, less income.

I don't generally enjoy commercial pop music but nor do I belittle the effort or talent involved in its creation.

To you I say live and let live. No need to try and change my mind. You could be the greatest pop music fan in the world and I would not be trying to change yours.

Cheers.

Reply
Chris Breeze
13/04/2012 9:08pm

That IS what your essential point is. To quote your piece;

"The emotional lyrics and raw acoustic accompaniment in this track (Someone Like You) are nothing like the digital, arpeggiator-created, effect-laden music typical of the charts and these producers."

You're saying the former is necessarily better than the latter which is obviously not correct. You may like it more, but that's irrelevant. You're the one who should 'live and let live'

I apologise for coming back when I implied I wouldn't and now absolutely promise to give you the last word.

Reply
13/04/2012 9:13pm

(above post published for the world's enjoyment)

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply